Kedudukan Kesaksian Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Pengadilan: Analisis Yuridis-Normatif Hukum Indonesia Dan Peradilan Islam
Keywords:
testimony, evidentiary system, criminal procedural law, Islamic judiciary, testimonium de audituAbstract
Testimony constitutes an essential evidentiary instrument within Indonesian and Islamic judicial systems, yet its application encounters practical complexities. This research aims to analyze the position of testimony in court evidentiary systems through a juridical-normative approach by comparing Indonesian positive law and Islamic law. The method employed is normative juridical with qualitative analysis of legal norms, testimony concepts, and case studies. Research findings indicate that: (1) Testimony regulation in KUHAP adheres to the negative legal system, while Islamic judiciary implements testimony hierarchy based on case types with more rigid standards; (2) Validity requirements for testimony in positive law emphasize procedural-formal aspects, whereas Islamic law applies the principles of 'adalah and dhabt with comprehensive tazkiyah al-syuhud mechanism; (3) The evidentiary position of testimony in Indonesian system is flexible with Constitutional Court Decision No. 65/PUU-VIII/2010 expanding acceptance of testimonium de auditu, while Islamic system applies the principle of "dar'u al-hudud bi al-syubuhat" for maximum prudence. This research concludes that despite different approaches, both systems converge toward justice objectives through mutually complementary mechanisms within Indonesia's legal plurality context.
References
Agusta, M. A., & Umara, N. S. (2022). Konstruksi Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Testimonium de auditu Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 93/Pid. B/2013/PN. TK). Al-Qisth Law Review, 6(1), 130-155. 10.24853/al-qisth.6.1.130-155
Al-Mawardi. (1996). Al-Ahkam al-Sulthaniyyah wa al-Wilayat al-Diniyyah. Kairo: Dar al-Hadits.
Al-Sarakhsi. (1993). Al-Mabsuth. Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah.
Al-Tirmidzi. (1998). Sunan al-Tirmidzi. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.
Al-Zuhaili, W. (2011). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr.
Arkadia, I. I. (2022). Telaah Pembuktian dan Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Menjatuhkan Pidana dengan Mengesampingkan Pembelaan dalam Perkara Persetubuhan Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 110/Pid. Sus./2017/PN. SKT). Verstek, 10(1), 94-100. 10.20961/jv.v10i1.63949
Audah, A. Q. (1992). Al-Tasyri' al-Jina'i al-Islami Muqaranan bi al-Qanun al-Wadh'i. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah.
Destiana, E. S., & Yulianti, S. W. (2021). Telaah Nilai Pembuktian Dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Atas Perluasan Keterangan Saksi Testimonium De Auditu. Verstek, 9(2).
Dwi Putri, dkk (2025). Evidentiary Status of Crown Witnesses in Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Proceedings: Legal Challenges and Human Rights Implications. Vol. 1 No. 3 https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v1i3.90
Franjić, S. (2024). The Witness Must Speak the Truth. Law and Economy, 3(3), 28-33. 10.56397/le.2024.03.04
Gabrelyan, A. Yu., & Chepel, O. V. (2023). Kesaksian saksi dalam proses pidana: konsep, isi, persyaratan. Jurnal Hukum Analitis-Komparatif, (4), 451-458.
Hawasara, W., Sinaulan, R. L., & Candra, T. Y. (2022). Penerapan dan Kecenderungan Sistem Pembuktian yang dianut dalam KUHAP. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 8(1), 587-594. 10.37905/aksara.8.1.587-594.2022
Ibnu Qudamah. (2004). Al-Mughni. Riyadh: Dar 'Alam al-Kutub.
Jaziri, A. (2003). Al-Fiqh 'ala al-Mazahib al-Arba'ah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.
Juliana, K. C. (2023). Studi Komparasi Pengaturan Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Sistem Hukum Indonesia Dan Korea Selatan. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 5(4), 1175-1184. 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18591
Keumala, C. D., Rizanizarli, R., & Hasyim, S. (2022). Testimonium De Auditu in The Case Rape of Childrens. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 22(2), 151-161. 10.18592/sjhp.v22i2.4953
Khallaf, A. W. (2002). 'Ilm Ushul al-Fiqh. Kairo: Maktabah al-Da'wah al-Islamiyyah.
Manan, A. (2006). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Kencana.
Marda, G., Dewangga, V., Musyaffa, R. A., & Kinanti, C. S. (2023). Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata Melalui Pengetahuan Hakim. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum: Hukum dan Kesejahteraan, 8(2), 35-49. 10.36722/jmih.v8i2.2306
Ni Made Cista Dewi (2025). Juridical Review of Witness Evidence in Criminal Case Trials Who Refuse to Take an Oath. West Science Law and Human Rights. Vol. 3, No. 03, 256~264
Prananto, I., Sunardi, S., & Muhibbin, M. (2023). Expert’s Testimony Evidence in the Criminal Justice Process in Indonesia. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 3(1), 125-135. 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.42
Putra, M. J. A., Busroh, F. F., & Utoyo, M. (2023). Analisa Hukum Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 65/Puu-Viii/2010 Dihubungkan Keabsahan Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Peristiwa Pidana Dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Lex Stricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(3), 135-152. 10.46839/lexstricta.v1i3.15
Qardhawi, Y. (2001). Madkhal li Dirasat al-Syari'ah al-Islamiyyah. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah.
Ramulyo, M. I. (2004). Asas-Asas Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Rohman, R., Muliadi, M., Pratama, F., Saputra, I., Firmansyah, A., Marwan, T., & Irfandi, I. (2024). Sistem Pembuktian dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Tantangan dalam Proses Peradilan. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 279-292. 10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.146
Sabiq, S. (2008). Fiqh al-Sunnah. Kairo: Dar al-Fath li al-I'lam al-'Arabi.
Syafi'i, R. (2015). Ilmu Ushul Fiqih. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Syarifuddin, A. (2014). Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
TRI, M. R. P., PARLAUNGAN, G. S., & DEWI, P. L. B. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Saksi Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006. JURNAL HUKUM DAN SOSIAL POLITIK Учредители: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Katolik Widya Karya Malang, 1(4), 228-237. 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i4.1646
Wijayanti, A. (2020). Judge's Assessment of the Statement of a Witness Victim with Mental Retardation in a Rape Case. Ius Poenale, 1(1), 13-26. 10.25041/IP.V1I1.2060
YAMIN, B., YULIANI, T., RACHMAN, M., & IMAWANTO, I. (2024). Analisis Hukum Keterangan Saksi Diatas Sumpah Di Persidangan Pengadilan Dilaporkan Di Institusi Kepolisian. Ganec Swara Учредители: Universitas Mahasaraswati Mataram, 18(4), 1828. 10.35327/gara.v18i4.1143
Hanafi, S., Nasoha, A. M. M., Nurrohman, A., & Atqiya, A. N. (2024). Kesaksian Orang Bisu dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia dan Fikih: Tantangan, Peluang, dan Implikasi Terhadap Keadilan. Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi, 159-170. 10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v6i2.8847
Mubarak, H., & Rahmadani, S. (2022). The Basic Considerations of Judges Regarding the Testimony of Istifadah Witnesses in the Case of Itsbat Nikah (Study of the Determination of the Syar'iyah Court of Kualasimpang Number 10/Pdt. P/2021/MS. ksg): Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Saksi Istifadah Dalam Perkara Itsbat Nikah (Studi Penetapan Mahkamah Syar'iyah Kualasimpang Nomor 10/p. dt/p/2021/ms. ksg). El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law, 2(1), 17-36. 10.22373/hadhanah.v2i1.1581
