Hisham Sharabi: The Anatomy of Neopatriarchy and Criticism of Arab Culture
Keywords:
Hisham Sharabi, Neopatriarchy, Arab Cultural Criticism, Modernity, EducationAbstract
Contemporary Arab thought has been significantly shaped by attempts to explain the failure of modernization in the Arab-Islamic world. One of the prominent scholars contributing to this discourse is Hisham Sharabi through his concept of neopatriarchy. This article aims to analyze the concept of neopatriarchy as an instrument of social and cultural criticism developed by Sharabi to examine the problems of modern Arab society. This study employs a library research method with a philosophical-critical approach. The primary sources consist of Sharabi’s major works, particularly Neopatriarchy: A Theory of Distorted Change in Arab Society, along with various supporting literature discussing contemporary Arab socio-political thought. Data were analyzed using content analysis and critical interpretation of Sharabi’s ideas. The findings reveal that neopatriarchy represents a distorted form of modernity, a condition in which societies adopt modern institutions while simultaneously preserving traditional patriarchal patterns of relationships based on domination, obedience, and subordination. These structures are reproduced within the family, education, religion, and the state, thereby hindering the development of rationality, democracy, and individual emancipation. Sharabi’s cultural critique emphasizes the importance of deconstructing authority, reforming education, practicing cultural self-criticism (naqd al-dhat), and fostering critical consciousness as prerequisites for social transformation. Sharabi’s thought remains highly relevant for understanding various issues facing contemporary Muslim societies, particularly those related to education, power relations, and the formation of a democratic culture.
References
Bamyeh, M. (2015). Social Sciences in the Arab World: Forms of Presence. 1–146.
Chanra, M., & Kasman, S. (2025). Memisahkan Agama dan Politik: Sebuah Tinjauan Teoretis dan Praktis. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(2), 1247–1256. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i2.6863
Governance, D., Religion, O., Abdul, T., & Soroush, K. (2024). Democratic Governance Of Religion The Abdul Karim Soroush Model. 19(1), 71–99.
Hasibuan, K., Kamil, S., & Matondang, A. P. (2025). Perang Enam Hari Menandai Kemunduran Arab; Kritik Sosio-Politik Nizzar Dalam Hawamisy ‘Ala Daftar Al-Naksah. Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 22(2), 464–475. https://doi.org/10.25299/ajaip.2025.vol22(2).22159
Imroatyssholihah. (2025). Peran agama dalam memperkuat / membentuk identitas nasional. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(5), 649–658.
Irwan Syazli Saidin, M., Kamal Mujani, W., & Azhani Mohd Mazuki, A. (2016). Perang Enam Hari Arab Israel 1967 Menerusi Perspektif Teori Realisme. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 9, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.9.2016.003
M. Agus Kurniawan. (n.d.). Metodologi Studi Islam.
Muharram, M. A. H. (2014). Occidentalism / Orientalism in Reverse: The West in the Eyes of Modern Arab Intellectuals. Journal of American Studies of Turkey, 39, 43–54. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/downlo ad/article-file/998646
Mukti, A. (2017). Alam Pikiran Arab-Islam: Kajian Pemikiran al-Jabiri tentang Turath.
Pace, J. L. (2005). Contemporary Arab Thought: Studies in Post-1967 Arab Intellectual History. In The Muslim World (Vol. 95, Number 1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.2005.0083b.x
Prasetyo, E. Y., & Sunaryo. (2024). Sinergi Hak Asasi Manusia, Agama, dan Sekularisme: Telaah Etis-Kultural atas Gagasan Abdullahi A. An-Na‘Im. Jurnal Peradaban, 4(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.51353/0ny6xv25
Purba, S. P., Umar Lubis, A. B., Hannase, M., & Muttaqin, M. I. (2024). Sejarah Nasionalisme Arab: Revolusi Gamal Abdul Nasser dan Implikasinya pada Mesir Modern. Politea, 7(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.21043/politea.v7i1.24565
Rahmadani, R., Daulay, H. P., & Sumanti, S. titin. (2024). Studi Sistem-Sistem Kebudayaan Masyarakat Arab Pra Islam. Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE), 4(6), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.31004/jh.v4i6.1973
Ramadhan, M. G., Ritonga, R. A., & Arif, M. D. (2026). Perbedaan Orientalis dan Oksidentalisme Etnologis , Kultural , dan Metodologik Secara. 03.
Rifka Alkhilyatul Ma’rifat, I Made Suraharta, I. I. J. (2024a). Occidentalism / Orientalism in Reverse: The West in the Eyes of Modern Arab Intellectuals. 2, 306–312.
Rifka Alkhilyatul Ma’rifat, I Made Suraharta, I. I. J. (2024b). Revolusi Mesir 23 Juli 1952: Berakhirnya Pemerintahan Raja Farouk. 2, 306–312.
Saefullah, A. S. (2024). Ragam Penelitian Kualitatif Berbasis Kepustakaan Pada Studi Agama dan Keberagamaan dalam Islam. Al-Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 2(4), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.59059/al-tarbiyah.v2i4.1428
Saprudin, A. (2025). Basis epistemologi tafsir Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd dalam kitab Mafhum an-Nas dan implikasinya terhadap desakralisasi Quran. Jejak Digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(6), 4267–4282.
Sari, F., & Rahma, F. I. (2023). Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Paham Keagamaan Aktual (Fundamentalisme, Radikalisme, Sekularisme Dan Liberalisme). Tut Wuri Handayani : Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(3), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.59086/jkip.v2i3.190
Sharabi, H. (1970). Arab intellectuals and the West: The formative years, 1875–1914. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sharabi, H. (1988). Neopatriarchy: A theory of distorted change in Arab society. Oxford University Press.
Sharabi, H. (1995). Over the Arab horizon: Reflections on culture, politics and society. Pluto Press.
Sharabi, H. (1987). Al-bunyah al-batrikiyyah: Bahth fi al-mujtama‘ al-‘Arabi al-mu‘asir [The patriarchal structure: A study of contemporary Arab society]. Dar al-Tali‘ah
Shobih, M. (2024). Teologi Hassan Hanafi. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal (MIJ), 2(8), 232–239.
Yoyo, Y. (2012). Tren Pemikiran Intelektual Muslim Kontemporer Di Timur Tengah Pasca-Difitisme 1967. Jurnal Kawistara, 2(3), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.3941
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Romi Astanti (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





